There is no law that requires road users to buy an e-tag or register with SANRAL in order to use Gauteng’s freeways.
In a response to Minister Peter’s comments for a plea to Gauteng road users to abide by the law and get e-tagged, OUTA points out that getting an e-tag has nothing to do with being law abiding.
But while getting e-tagged and registering with SANRAL has nothing to do with being law abiding, what it does do is make SANRAL’s task of enforcing e-tolling easier. Road users must be aware that getting an e-tag and registering with SANRAL places road users on SANRAL’s system and binds road users to a contract to pay e-tolls.
Getting e-tagged also limits the right of road users to object to paying tolls and to resist an unjust system.
Choosing not to get e-tagged and register with SANRAL allows road users to continue to object to paying e-tolls and to resist the implementation of e-tolling.
The choice whether to get e-tagged or not is up to each individual road user.
Non-Tagged road users, will according to statements by SANRAL and the e-Toll regulations
Non-Tagged road users can exercise their own choices:
As regards the second option, every individual citizen has the right to resist the enforcement of unlawful action by Government against him or her. In this regard, the courts have not finally ruled on whether e-tolling is lawful or unlawful and the Supreme Court of Appeal judgment has made it clear that it is still open to individuals to challenge the enforcement of e-tolling on the basis that it is unlawful.
OUTA’s legal team has evidence to show that e-tolling is unlawful, amongst other reasons, because SANRAL failed to comply with the law when it failed to properly inform the public of the intent to toll Gauteng’s freeways at the outset and to conduct the legally required public participation procedure in October 2007 (for the N1, N3, N4 and N12) and April 2008 (for the R21). OUTA intends to bring, or assist in the bringing, of a test case in this regard in order that the liability of road users to pay eTolls be decided by the courts once and for all. This time SANRAL and Government will not be able to hide behind technical defences such as delay, as they could and successfully did when resisting OUTA’s efforts to stop e-tolling before it started. Proceedings against individuals are different, and the courts will have no option but to decide whether e-tolling is in fact lawful or unlawful when SANRAL seeks to enforce e-tolling against individuals.
Road users must be aware that the buy-in by road users for e-Tolling remains very poor and the vast majority of road users still refuse to be e-tolling.
According to last night’s statement by the Minister of Transport, only been 21,000 e-tag sales in the two weeks since the announcement that e-tolling would start on 3 December 2013, which apparently brings the total of e-Tag sales to around 730,000. OUTA believes this is a dismal e-tag uptake and sends a strong signal that society at large has given the system the thumbs down. Effectively, with e-tolls being launched in the next 24 hours, we have a case of less than a third of the 2,5 million freeway users being e-tagged well below the required levels to make it a success. Readers must also bear in mind that e-tag sales are not the same as e-tag registrations as as it is possible to buy an e-tag from certain outlets without yet registering. In other words, the 730,000 may in real terms be no indication of road user buy-in at all. We also know that most of these numbers claimed by Sanral are taken up by Government fleets and leasing / rental companies.
Furthermore, a survey conducted by reputable research company – Ipsos – has also substantiated that over 42% of people do not intend to get tagged. “This situation is a far cry from a picture of people ‘flocking’ to get tagged, the picture which SANRAL and the Minister of Transport are trying to create, and without committed buy-in and e-tag uptake, the system is doomed,” says Wayne Duvenage, OUTA’s Chairperson.