Your cart is empty!
OUTA Complaint to SAHRC
OUTA notified the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) about the lack of monitoring and compliance by the Department of Water and Sanitation, which is the custodian of South Africa's water.
OUTA asked the SAHRC to investigate our complaint
OUTA notified the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) about the lack of monitoring and compliance by the Department of Water and Sanitation which is the custodian of South Africa's water resources.
OUTA aimed to ensure legislative compliance in South Africa’s water sector.
The central problem is the Department of Water and Sanitation's failure to provide effective oversight.
A copy of this complaint is here: OUTA complaint to SAHRC
OUTA's complaint said that a widespread violation of the public’s constitutional right to access to clean and sufficient water (as contemplated in section 27(1)(b) of the Constitution) had taken place due to the Department of Water and Sanitation’s failure to comply with the Water Services Act and the National Water Act,, which give effect to this significant constitutional provision. "The prolonged inaction of the department amounts to a constitutional violation on a continuous basis, utterly lacking in transparency and accountability," said OUTA's complaint.
In March 2017, OUTA submitted a formal complaint to the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) about the department's failures. The SAHRC referred this to the Public Protector, which by February 2021 had still failed to provide a response.
-
20 March 2017: OUTA submits complaint to SAHRC.
-
22 March 2017: Received response from the SAHRC indicating that complaint has been referred to the Public Protector.
-
8 November 2017: Public Protector confirmed receipt of complaint from OUTA. The Gauteng Provincial Office of the Public Protector indicated that the complaint has been referred to the Public Protector's national office for handling.
-
22 February 2018: OUTA followed up with complaint with the Public Protector.
-
22 March 2018: Further follow-up by OUTA to the Public Protector.
-
3 May 2018: Further follow-up by OUTA to the Public Protector; Public Protector indicated that a response would be sent to OUTA.
-
10 May 2018: Further follow-up by OUTA to the Public Protector, but no response pertaining to the merits of the complaint have been forthcoming.
-
23 November 2018: OUTA sent final letter to the Public Protector, following which failure to respond will require OUTA to consider available legal avenues.
In 2018, the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) started an investigation into the pollution of the Vaal River in the Emfuleni area, and whether this was a violation of human rights and environmental rights.
OUTA made two submissions to the SAHRC on this.
OUTA's first submission, on 25 September 2018, is here: Emfuleni washes away human rights
OUTA's second submission, on 30 November 2018, is here: Submission on Sedibeng Regional Sanitation Scheme.
OUTA's second submission recommended that the SAHRC investigate the Sedibeng Regional Sanitation Scheme (SRSS) project.
The SRSS was initiated by Emfuleni Local Municipality following an assessment of the status of the sewer infrastructure. It aimed at addressing the following challenges:
• The spillage of raw sewage in to the Vaal River;
• The discharge of non-compliant effluent into the Vaal River;
• The likely environmental and health effects of that pollution;
• The affect on economic and socio-economic growth in the region; and
• The high maintenance costs and frequent failures of the old sanitation infrastructure.
The project aimed to expand the capacity of the waste-water treatment plants in Sebokeng and Meyerton. This included reducing the spillage of raw sewage into the Vaal River.
OUTA drew the Commission’s attention to the fact that the national Department of Water and Sanitation stopped the project from being implemented by Emfuleni Local Municipality in 2012 and put in place Rand Water as the implementing agent.
OUTA thus recommended that the Commission:
• Assesses how the suspension and transfer of the SRSS from Emfuleni to Rand Water may have contributed towards pollution in the Vaal River;
• Assesses the legality of the suspension and transfer of the project;
• Assesses how the removal of the SRSS from Emfuleni and other relevant municipalities adversely affected the operation and maintenance of sewerage networks, particularly those networks that contribute to pollution in the Vaal; and
• Requests audited and verified reports from Rand Water on the progress of the SRSS, with an indication of the extent to which such progress has reduced pollution in the Vaal.
The SAHRC inquiry released its report on 17 February 2021.
The SAHRC report is here: SAHRC Report on Vaal River
The SAHRC report is here: SAHRC Report on Vaal River
OUTA believes that the apathetic attitude and failure of the Department of Water and Sanitation towards enforcing compliance and criminal sanctions on municipalities for sewage pollution is criminal, a human rights violation and one of the biggest threats to water security in South Africa.
We will only see proper change when the first municipal manager sits in jail for sewage pollution.
OUTA believes that negligence can be proven in the Vaal pollution matter and that criminal prosecution should go ahead.
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.
No Bluedrop reports made public since 2014
How Safe is your water?